review this trend, which has major negative consequences for land and water use and environmental change. By evading certain controls, these can be much more damaging to the environment. While this is good news for the paper manufacturers, the repercussions of growing paper consumption and increased production could be dramatic for our environment. Moderating consumption levels requires moderating human desires and human nature, as well as going against a capitalist cultural system that is based on the assumption that economic growth can increase forever. Americans and Western Europeans have had a lock on unsustainable over- consumption for decades. Today milk, butter, cheese, yogurt, ice cream, and other dairy products are ubiquitous, consumed by more than 6 billion people worldwide. Food consumption and production have a considerable impact on the environment. WWF is working to limit its impact on the environment. Food production contributes, for example, to climate change, eutrophication and acid rain, as well as the depletion of biodiversity. But now developing countries are catching up rapidly, to the detriment of the environment… To complicate matters, environmental impacts of high levels of consumption are not confined to the local area or even country. By 2050 meat consumption could increase by 160% and this demand for meat is not sustainable for our planet. To be good, food needs to be responsibly sourced and consumed, as well as healthy. Meat consumption is rising annually as human populations grow and affluence increases. Meat production is projected to double by 2020 due to increased per capita global consumption of meat and population growth. For example, the use of fossil fuels for energy (to drive our bigger cars, heat and cool our bigger houses) has an impact on global CO 2 levels and resulting environmental effects. Rising global meat consumption is likely to have a devastating environmental impact, scientists have warned. Here, we explore the evidence base for these assertions and the options policy-makers have should they wish to intervene to affect population meat consumption. . A new major analysis suggests meat consumption … These trends will have major consequences on the global environment. The overall impact of not eating meat on the environment is very positive. growth.The consumption of different types of meat and meat products has substantial effects on people’s health, and livestock production can have major negative effects on the environment. By increasing demand, the consumption of resources is much greater, which affects the environment through the production processes. Paper consumption takes precious natural resources As world wide population increases and sanitation standards improve, people tend to consume more paper products. Godfray et al. Although meat is a concentrated source of nutrients for low-income families, it also enhances the risks of chronic ill health, such as from colorectal cancer and cardiovascular disease. Increasing consumption desires are a subtler, more serious, and more difficult to solve problem than population growth. References "Consumerism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia." Landscape deeply scarred by an open cut coal mine in Hunter Valley, Australia.Max Phillips / Flickr Consumption of resources . T his will start to decrease, slowly but surely, as more of us continue to choose to stop eating meat. A report produced by the International Resource Panel (IRP), part of the UN Environment Programme, says rising consumption driven by a growing middle class has seen resources extraction increase from 22 billion tons in 1970 to 70 billon tons in 2010. Most of this increase in production will come through industrialized animal production systems.
2020 impact of increased consumption on environment